Difference:
ResultsPDG2016
(1 vs. 2)
Revision 2
16 May 2016 - Main.DenisDerkach
Line: 1 to 1
META TOPICPARENT
name="Results"
Fit results: PDG 2016
This fit is prepared with the
Changed:
<
<
inputs
for the Particle Data Group 2014 Review.
>
>
inputs
for the Particle Data Group 2016 Review.
Parameter
Full fit
CKM matrix thus looks like
Full fit result for
95% prob:[0.102, 0.182]
99% prob:[0.084, 0.203]
EPS
-
PDF
-
PNG
-
JPG
-
GIF
Full fit result for
95% prob:[0.324, 0.373]
99% prob:[0.312, 0.387]
EPS
-
PDF
-
PNG
-
JPG
-
GIF
Full fit result for
95% prob:[0.794, 0.846]
99% prob:[0.780, 0.858]
EPS
-
PDF
-
PNG
-
JPG
-
GIF
Full fit result for
95% prob:[0.22485, 0.22653]
99% prob:[0.22435, 0.22693]
EPS
-
PDF
-
PNG
-
JPG
-
GIF
Full fit result for
95% prob:[2.88, 3.30]
99% prob:[2.78, 3.42]
EPS
-
PDF
-
PNG
-
JPG
-
GIF
View topic
|
H
istory
: r2
<
r1
|
More topic actions...
Powered by
Ideas, requests, problems regarding this web site?
Send feedback