# Difference: ConstraintEpsK (1 vs. 6)

Revision 6
Line: 1 to 1

## Constraint from

Changed:
<
<
Indirect CP violation in the Kaon system is usually expressed in terms of parameter which is the fraction of CP violating component in the mass eigenstates and which is usually defined as:
>
>
Indirect CP violation in the Kaon system is usually expressed in terms of parameter which is the fraction of the CP violating component in the mass eigenstates and which is usually defined as:

Line: 14 to 14
Top and charm quarks contribute to the expression of the mixing in K0-K0 system. The calculation of the box diagram gives

Changed:
<
<
M_{12} = \frac{G_F^2}{12\pi^2} F_K^2 B_K M_K M_W^2 \left [ \lambda_c^{*2} \eta_t S_0 (x_c) + \lambda_t^{*2} \eta_2 S_0 (x_t)+2\lambda_t^* \lambda_c^* \eta_3 S(x_c,~x_t) \right ] with
>
>
M_{12} = \frac{G_F^2}{12\pi^2} F_K^2 B_K M_K M_W^2 \left [ \lambda_c^{*2} \eta_t S_0 (x_c) + \lambda_t^{*2} \eta_2 S_0 (x_t)+2\lambda_t^* \lambda_c^* \eta_3 S(x_c,~x_t) \right ] where

which allows one to write
Line: 26 to 26
C_\epsilon = \frac{G_F^2 F_K^2 M_K M_W^2}{6\sqrt{2}\pi^2 \Delta M_K } = 3.84 \cdot 10^4.
Changed:
<
<
The expression actually used in the UT fit is obtained writing in terms of and the other elements of CKM matrix:
>
>
The expression actually used in the UT fit is obtained by writing in terms of and the other elements of CKM matrix:

Line: 38 to 38

• Set plot = EpsKRhoEta?
-->
Changed:
<
<

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF
>
>

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Revision 5
Line: 1 to 1

## Constraint from

Line: 34 to 34

Changed:
<
<

[EPS format] [JPG format]
>
>
<--
Set plot = EpsKRhoEta?

-->

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Revision 4
06 Apr 2010 - Main.VittorioLubicz
Line: 1 to 1

## Constraint from

Line: 14 to 14
Top and charm quarks contribute to the expression of the mixing in K0-K0 system. The calculation of the box diagram gives

Changed:
<
<
M_{12} = \frac{G_F^2}{12\pi^2} F_K^2 B_K M_K M_W^2 \left [ \lambda_c^{*2} \eta_t S_0 (x_c) + \lambda_t^{*2} \eta_2 S_0 (x_t)+2\lambda_t^* \lambda_c^* \eta_3 S(x_c,~x_t) \right ] with
>
>
M_{12} = \frac{G_F^2}{12\pi^2} F_K^2 B_K M_K M_W^2 \left [ \lambda_c^{*2} \eta_t S_0 (x_c) + \lambda_t^{*2} \eta_2 S_0 (x_t)+2\lambda_t^* \lambda_c^* \eta_3 S(x_c,~x_t) \right ] with

which allows one to write
Line: 25 to 23
where

Changed:
<
<
C_\epsilon = \frac{G_F^2 F_K^2 M_K M_W^2}{6\sqrt{2} \Delta M_K } = 3.78 \cdot 10^4.
>
>
C_\epsilon = \frac{G_F^2 F_K^2 M_K M_W^2}{6\sqrt{2}\pi^2 \Delta M_K } = 3.84 \cdot 10^4.

The expression actually used in the UT fit is obtained writing in terms of and the other elements of CKM matrix:
Line: 36 to 34

Changed:
<
<

[EPS format]   [JPG format]
>
>

[EPS format] [JPG format]

Revision 3
04 Apr 2010 - Main.VincenzoVagnoni
Line: 1 to 1

>
>

## Constraint from

Indirect CP violation in the Kaon system is usually expressed in terms of parameter which is the fraction of CP violating component in the mass eigenstates and which is usually defined as:

Revision 2
02 Apr 2010 - Main.VincenzoVagnoni
Line: 1 to 1
Changed:
<
<
-- VincenzoVagnoni - 01 Apr 2010
>
>

Indirect CP violation in the Kaon system is usually expressed in terms of parameter which is the fraction of CP violating component in the mass eigenstates and which is usually defined as:

where

Top and charm quarks contribute to the expression of the mixing in K0-K0 system. The calculation of the box diagram gives

with

which allows one to write

where

The expression actually used in the UT fit is obtained writing in terms of and the other elements of CKM matrix:

The experimental values we use are summarized in the Table of Inputs. The representation of this constraint in the plane is given below.

[EPS format]   [JPG format]