## New Physics Fit results: Summer 2014

The fit presented here is meant to constrain the NP contributions to |Δ F|=2 transitions by using the available experimental information on loop-mediated processes In general, NP models introduce a large number of new parameters: flavour changing couplings, short distance coefficients and matrix elements of new local operators. The specific list and the actual values of these parameters can only be determined within a given model. Nevertheless mixing processes are described by a single amplitude and can be parameterized, without loss of generality, in terms of two parameters, which quantify the difference of the complex amplitude with respect to the SM one. Thus, for instance, in the case of mixing we define
where includes only the SM box diagrams, while also includes the NP contributions. In the absence of NP effects, and by definition. In a similar way, one can write
Concerning , to be conservative, we add to the short-distance contribution a possible long-distance one that varies with a uniform distribution between zero and the experimental value of .

The experimental quantities determined from the mixings are related to their SM counterparts and the NP parameters by the following relations:

in a self-explanatory notation.

All the measured observables can be written as a function of these NP parameters and the SM ones ρ and η, and additional parameters such as masses, form factors, and decay constants.

Parameter Input value Full fit

The fit results for all the nine CKM elements are

Full fit result for

95% prob:[0.070, 0.241]
99% prob:[0.028, 0.308]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

95% prob:[0.268, 0.461]
99% prob:[0.205, 0.538]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

95% prob:[0.072, 0.247]
99% prob:[0.028, 0.316]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

95% prob:[0.275, 0.473]
99% prob:[0.210, 0.552]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

95% prob:[0.763, 0.842]
99% prob:[0.743, 0.862]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Fit Input for

95% prob:[0.2235, 0.2271]
99% prob:[0.2226, 0.228]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full Fit result for

95% prob:[0.2241, 0.2266]
99% prob:[0.2234, 0.2272]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

95% prob:[0.76, 1.43]
99% prob:[0.63, 1.68]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

95% prob:[-8., 4.4]
99% prob:[-13, 8.8] U [37., 37.]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

correlations for

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

95% prob:[0.9, 1.23]
99% prob:[0.837, 1.336]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

95% prob:[-3., 4.7]
99% prob:[-5., 6.8]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

correlations for

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full fit result for

95% prob:[0.77, 1.41]
99% prob:[-0.9, -0.8] U [0.64, 1.79]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Fit Input for
Gaussian likelihood used

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full Fit result for

95% prob:[-0.0056, 0.00129]
99% prob:[-0.0072, 0.00339]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Fit Input for
Gaussian likelihood used

EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF

Full Fit result for

95% prob:[-0.0013, 0.00108]
99% prob:[-0.0018, 0.00172]
EPS - PDF - PNG - JPG - GIF